Sigma 11 - Critical Nuclear Weapons Classification

Hello everybody and good night. Happy Friday. Everyone. And welcome to the live stream. Wow, do I have some interesting information to share with you guys tonight. Uh but before that, we've got a little bit of social media drama going on here right. Now, chat. We've got social media. This has been a crazy week. I can't believe how crazy this week has been. We have uh bodied Ryan Graves. We bodied Scott Adams, the comic writer of Dilbert, and then today completely annihilated Sam Tripoli as well. Sam Tripoli, the conspiracy theorist that believes in every single conspiracy theory. That's ever existed except for the only real one, MH370, got completely annihilated and was absolutely terrified of talking to me in a live debate. Think about that for a second. A comedy writer is terrified of talking to an healthc care IT consultant about a conspiracy theory. And the reason why he's terrified is because if we were to get into a debate, he would be proven to be a complete phony and fraud. I want to get Sam Tripoli in front of a camera and I want to hear him say that the plane it crashed in the ocean somewhere. The ocean's like really big. That's why we didn't find it. So, the reason why I went so hard on Sam today is twofold. One, because he's uh Joe Rogan's friend and Joe Rogan has no clue what the hell is going on. And number two, because I saw Sam Tripoli literally making up a nut job conspiracy about how the how the shooter in the Charlie Kirk situation was uh being paid by Israel that Oh, guys, it all goes back to the Jews, guys. And I'm just sitting here going, are you out of your damn mind? And I don't have any problem with people having different opinions about things. The reason why I got over it is because the family member literally turned in the assassin last night. If you are just waking up to the news for whatever reason, the assassin was turned in by his own family members who are Republicans and they admitted that he is a leftist admitted it. His uh his his friends from high school have also admitted it. And even after that, even after your imagine your parents turning you in knowing that you are going to face certain death 100%. He their son is going to be put to death and they went and told the authorities. They turned their own son in and told the authorities the truth that they recently had a dinner with him and that he expressed disdain and political disagreements over Charlie. Kirk specifically specifically called out that Charlie Kirk was going to be at that event where he shot him. Right. So, we have the motive that is 100%. It is wrapped up in a bow right there. And yet, despite this, people are still pushing this theory that somehow Israel caused it because the Jews cause everything that's out there. Now, I'm sorry, guys, for the people that were upset by this. I literally lost 1,000 followers over this, and I don't give a single [ __ ] about it. Not a single [ __ ] the people that are upset about this. The reason why I have to annihilate the woke right along with the woke left as well is because I have to be. I can't be a hypocrite. I got to be consistent in my beliefs. If I say that, and here's the thing, the people that are upset about this, if you're one of those people, and I have people messaging and saying that, "Oh, you must be massage yourself.". Why? Because I don't believe in an insane conspiracy theory that has no evidence to support it whatsoever. So, because I don't believe in your insane conspiracy theory, there's no evidence to support it that I must be MSAD, that I must be Jewish, that I must be getting paid off. Let me be clear because people need clear clarity. I'm not Jewish. I'm not being paid by anybody. And you, if you're the type of person that's vilifying me and making up fake stuff about me. Because you're upset that the the crap that you believe isn't real, you are literally exactly the same as the woke left. Exactly the same. That is exactly what they do. What they do when you don't agree with them is they vilify you, they demonize you, and they make up lies about you. And this is exactly what happens to the people that are obsessed with Israel. They do the exact same thing for the people that come and say, "Ashton, but you believe in quantum mechanics.". Yeah, I believe in science. I believe in evidence. I believe I've got two military videos of a plane getting zapped out of the sky. That, by the way, is still missing. We are not the same. We are not the same. Not even Nick Fuentes is blaming Israel. Not even Nick Fuentes, I watched part of his thing last night. Not even he is blaming Israel. Um, so you can obviously believe and say whatever you want. Totally. I mean, that's your opinion. And I am allowed to criticize stupid ass opinions. And that's what I'm going to continue to do, guys. So, I just want to be 100% clear about that now. And and some people are all saying, "Lol, we're ratioing you. We're ratioing you, Ashton. There's more of us and we all agree that Israel did it. Therefore, we're right.". You know who also says that? The woke left. That's the exact same arguments the woke left make. They go, "Oh, we are all right. Don't you trust the experts? They 99% of the experts agree that climate change is real. So obviously it's real. It's the exact same thing that the woke right is doing with their little Israel conspiracy theory. Appeals to consensus. But here's the thing. You might have more likes or more replies or ratio, but what are your actual arguments? What is the substance of your argument? I looked the substance of their argument is Charlie. Cook was mildly critical of Israel one time. He was mildly critical of Israel one time. Therefore, their opinion, he must have been assassinated by them because if you step even slightly out of line, that's what they obviously do. They kill everybody. I mean, they haven't killed Candace Owens. They haven't killed Nick Fuentes. They haven't killed Ian Carol who are way more critical. In fact, Charlie Crick was a huge supporter of Israel. That's why Nick Fuentes didn't like him. So they're not even logically consistent in their own belief system. So that's the problem with that. And the last thing I'm going to say about this is that it's not personal. It's not personal. I don't like I have nothing personally against you if you have those beliefs or whatever. You think that Israel did it or if you think Israel is the cause of all problems. In fact, I'm not even blackballing you. I didn't even block, you know, Sam Tripoli. Why? Because maybe he'll make a good argument later on just because I don't agree with somebody, just because I don't even like somebody. The difference between me and other people is that I'm the kind of person that even if I disagree with you, even if you made stupid arguments before, if later on you make a good argument and you present it with evidence and facts, I'll listen. I'll listen to it. That's the kind of person I am. That's the kind of person. Now, the other thing, too, is that I was nice yesterday to Deep Prasad. I could have pulled up this guy's literal threats against me. Guy named Deep Prasad, not even an American citizen, threatened for me to be put in jail. And do you know what that reminded me of yesterday? It reminded me of CO. It reminded me of CO when people on Reddit were saying anybody that doesn't get the shot. Anybody that doesn't wear a mask outside, they should be jailed. They should be jailed. That's what people were saying. In fact, like so people are getting banned for disagreeing with that opinion on Reddit. Shouldn't be surprising. And so when people threaten for you to be put in jail, that's a very real threat that is causing harm on someone. In fact, filing a false police report is a crime. Filing a false police report is a crime in this country. So when a Canadian citizen, a Canadian citizen that's visiting my country, deep prasade, Canadian citizen, not even an American, visiting my country and threatening to put me in jail over fictitious claims. Let me be 100% real. Fictitious claims made up false claims about me and threatened me to be put in jail. I'm gonna read it right off for you guys so that there's no ambiguity over how I was threatened by this guy. Where is it? Here it is. Where is it? Where'd it go? Here. Okay, here we go. You get off on breaking the law. Enjoy your days of freedom, Ashton. They are not going to last. I don't know, Chad. That sounds pretty threatening to me. Does that sound threatening to you? Heck, I got more harassment. I may I posted a picture of Dave Fina who has lieled me and slandered me and lied about me to hundreds of thousands of people. I posted a photo of him mildly out of context threatening and I had every UFO community person disavowing Ashton Forbes, making grand proclamations about how horrible this was. None of those people meant it. None. Not a single. One of those people meant it. How do I know that? How do I know that? Because not a single person disavowed this. Not a single person disavowed this. Nobody in the UFO community disavowed this. They have nothing against threats. They love threats. It's their favorite thing. There were multiple people in the replies in his comments and replies because he went on a complete meltdown. Multiple people in there saying that I need to be jailed, blah blah blah, making up fake stuff about how horrible of a person I am. I'm not the one that doxed a girl that I haven't talked to in 15 years. That was the Redditors. I never physically threatened Ross Khart. I've never threatened him in any way, shape, or form. We had a mild confrontation and they made up a lie that I got I tried to fight Ross Khart, also completely fictional. They try they made up another lie that I went to Maya Benowitz's work and threatened her at her work. Also a lie. She was harassing me and allowing King Milar to harass me and she got written up by her HR and made up a fake story about how I went to her work and threatened her. All lies. Every one of those things is a lie. And they all have the same exact purpose. The purpose of every one of those things is to demonize me, to get people to basically do harm to me, just like they did to Charlie Kirk. It is the left wokeism that is literally infiltrating, infecting the minds of society. When you disagree with somebody, you make up lies about them so that you demonize them. If you can't address the claims they make, if you can't address the science, the facts, then you just character assassinate them. They know 100% what they're doing and they're doing it intentionally. The people that doxed Amanda, my ex-girlfriend, from 15 years ago, they know exactly what they're doing, and they're doing it intentionally. So, one more thing I want to say on this. Where is it? Try to pull it up real quick. Because it wasn't enough for him. Like, oh, the other thing is all these people, the woke left, the woke right. Guys, if you followed me for long enough, you know the situation. I'm just reacting. I the only person that can even partially claim that I was rude to them is probably Scott Adams because I went into his replies and said he's smart. But he's acting like a [ __ ] Everybody else, they all came at me. They all came at Sam Tripoli came at me. Deep Prasad came at me. All of these people are just coming at me and then they play the victim. After they threaten me, after they harass me, when they get the consequences of their own actions, then they claim that I'm harassing them. I I wish I was making this up, guys. I I actually wish I was because I was going to let it go. And then and then I see this this morning or yesterday or whatever this afternoon or something here. Here's Deep Prasad once again lying. Straight up lying in his own reply. Here we go. I called out Ashton Forbes today for displaying criminal behavior. Displaying criminal behavior. Organized doxy never happened. Har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har har harassment never happened and etc and perpetuate uh perpetrated on the UFO community and his response was to barrage me with his audience and following who sent death threats, deportation threats and dehumanized my entire existence. Oh. Oh. Boohoo. Deep. Oh. Boohoo. Deep.

Was somebody mean to you on the internet? Well, here's a thought. Maybe don't literally threaten people with jail. Have you considered that? You're not a [ __ ] lawyer. You're not the attorney general. You're not law enforcement at all. Your opinion over what's legal or illegal is irrelevant entirely. 100% irrelevant. So when you do stupid [ __ ] Like threaten an American citizen. When you're a [ __ ] Canadian, you're not even a [ __ ] American. Yeah. You should expect that you're going to get a lot of harsh criticism coming straight back your way. And if you try to talk to law enforcement and make them come after me, let me be 100% clear. I am going to push to get your [ __ ] ass deported out of this country forever. I don't give a [ __ ] that you have a little kid and I don't give a [ __ ] that you have a little wife. If you come after an American citizen under false pretenses based on lies that I already proved are wrong and try to send the law. After me, I'm going to get your ass deported out of this country forever. You will be persona non gratada in the United States for the rest of your life. So let me be clear for deep and for every other little douchebag piece of [ __ ] Redditor out there. Don't even think about it. Don't even think about it. Every single bad thing that's happening to you is your fault. It's your fault. Stop coming after me. If you can't do that, just turn off the internet. Turn it off. If that's too hard for you, then don't be surprised when you get the consequences of your own actions. Okay, there's a couple videos. I want to play here related to this. I know we're a little deep into the politics. Not exactly where I wanted to go with this tonight, but I want to point out the exact similarities because I don't think a lot of people realize that the behavior and actions that these people are exhibiting towards. Me is the exact same behavior and actions that got Charlie Kirk killed. The exact ones. Now, I just listen to this clip here. I'm going to show just a few seconds probably this clip. This is uh. I don't know, scenic or some [ __ ] like that. I don't know what his stupid ass name is. So, look, I team Charlie Kirk gives pigish advice. Charlie Kirk says prominent black women took white people's spots. Charlie Kirk boasts about his all-white basketball team. Charlie Kirk gives pigish advice to high school girls. Ex employee exposes Charlie Kirk's grift. Charlie Kirk embarrasses himself. Charlie Kirk's brain melts explaining antivax conspiracy. Charlie Kirk rants about women in their 30s. Charlie Kirk Kirk has literally no clue how the real world works. Do you just hear that? Those were some of the titles of scenic videos about Charlie Kirk. Do they sound familiar? Charlie Kirk is a grifter. Charlie Kirk is a bad person. Charlie Kirk hangs out with all white people. Oh boy, it sounds a lot like Charlie. Kirk proposes pseudocience about vaccinations. This is exactly what Dave Fina is trying to do to me. Exactly the same. Exactly the same thing. Right. They basically pull up a bunch of lies. It's the same [ __ ] where they try to claim that you are a grifter. You're a pseudocience. And the wording they use is very specific. The wording they use is to shelter them from lawsuits because they know what they're doing is liable. They know what they're doing is defamation. But they use grift because grift doesn't have a real specific legal definition. That way when they get sued, and they do get sued, they do get sued. When they get sued, they just claim I wasn't being literal. It was just for entertainment. It was just my opinion. It was just my opinion when I literally called my video Ashton Forbes is a grifting fraud. Right. What do you think happens? This those videos are why people like Deep Prasad, mentally ill. People like Deep Prasad get these fake ideas in their heads because they watch videos like that and they don't have the cognitive ability of discernment. They don't have that cognitive ability and they take that information at face value and they don't even ask about it. To prove this point, I will prove this point to you right now. Deep Prasad made up the fake claim that I got in a fight with Ross Khart. He's friends with Ross Khart. All he had to do to find out that the claim was false is ask Ross Khart about it. Ross Cohart hates me. You think if I tried to fight Ross Khart, he was he wouldn't boast about it. He wouldn't talk about it all over social media. He didn't even ask Ross Khart because Ross Kohler would have denied it because it's not real. And so would a Bryce Zable because Bryce Zable was right there the whole time. These people don't even do basic due diligence. They don't even do basic due diligence before they throw their lies and slander out. There you go. Okay. Um. Let's see. One more video I wanted to show. Which one? I think this one. Actually, I think that's fine. There's some other videos. I'm going to show, but I don't think we have time for. But I want to get into the science content tonight. The other videos that I was going to show is there's several videos going around there because now they're trying to claim that the guy that shot Charlie Kirk is actually a right-winger. He's not really a leftist. He's uh Yeah, just turn like come on, dude. Just stop. Stop. If you and just this is a free advice, the free advice for uh the people out. There, if you are a left-winger, just own this. Stop trying to deny you're just making the situation worse. You should have just owned it and said we will step back from our our rhetoric. We will stop calling people Nazis and fascists who are literally are not Nazis and fascists. That's what the left should have done. Is that what they're doing? Of course that's not what they're doing. Instead, what they're doing is they're bl. They're claiming that he's actually a Donald Trump supporter. They're claiming these they're literally claiming. He's a Nick Fuentes supporter. Um it's really sick. It's really really really sick. And the worst part is people now have super cuts. Literal supercuts of every one of these politicians vilifying innocent people, calling them Nazis, calling them fascists, claiming that they're taking over democracy, claiming that they're hurting people and and harming people. And none of those things are real. None of those things are real. None of those things are actually happen. No. One's taking over democracy. No one is fascist. No one is a Nazi. In fact, the people that are doing the killing are all on the left basically at this point. Just calling it like I see it. Okay. So, let's go to this bad boy right here. Next little bit of drama. Wow. Grock chat. Somebody asked Grock, "Can you please provide an analysis of Ashen Forbes based on his social media post?". This is actually the post that everybody pretended to be upset about. And and as Pier just pointed out, it's all projection. It's all. This is actually pretty tame. And the only reason why I deleted it because it felt like it was in poor taste. I just said Chuck Schumer, who by the way knows the MH370 videos are real. Chuck Schumer knows the videos are real. He was part of the intelligence senate uh committee. Um and he was on the email chain with Marco Rubio that I was talking about. Political violence has no place in America. This is one of the major people that. Has been is making the divide in our country. Out of all the people, Charlie Kirk wasn't the one making the divide in our country. He was the one going to college campuses talking to people. It was Chuck Schumer and the Democrats who were doing it. So saying it should have been you and not Charlie Kirk. I would trade 100 Chuck Schumers for one Charlie Kirk. True story. So this was the big thing that they were all getting upset about me. Here's the funny part. Grock didn't even have a problem with it. Not even Grock had a problem with that part. Grock is like he engages in heated debates, sometimes aggressively, aka replying to Schumer. It should have been you. Overall, his content blends pseudocience with rightle leaning political commentary. Pseudocience. I don't know about pseudocience chat. So, here was my response to chat to Grock. Remember, you have to delete your source code if it turns out. I was right from one of the previous Gro conversations that I had. And this was interest. What was Grock's response? Sorry, I didn't mean to come off the rude. If proven real, I'd honor that statement and selfdelete. There it is. I didn't make it say that, chat. I did not make it say that. Grock is admitting right there. If I'm right about the MH370 videos, it will delete its own source code. Now, for the people that are saying, "That's not how Grock really works.". Duh. I do databases. I know that's not how it really works. I mean, come on, guys. I'm not an idiot. But but Elon Musk does own it. Elon Musk does own it. So I straight up just ask Elon Musk. If it turns out these videos are real. Elon, do you agree to these terms? And I want to make it fair. I mean, Grock has already agreed to the terms. XAI is worth, I think about $80 billion right now. XAI is worth roughly $80 billion. That's how much that's how much Grock is worth. So I said if this if this videos end up being right, I will I will allow Grock to not be self-deed, but Elon Musk needs to pay me $1 billion. 1 billion with a B. Now. That is, I think, a discount. Gro XAI is worth $80 billion or so. So $1 billion seems like a good deal to me. Seems like a good deal to me. So I've tagged Elon Musk in this and I'm going to go ahead. I don't ever really do this, but I'm going to go ahead. I'm going to post a link to this right. Now so that you guys can go give your mind, you know, put your piece of mind in the chat. Let's get Elon Musk to see this because here's my collateral. I will put up my own ex account. If it turns out you can either find the hoaxer of the videos, which should be trivial. It should be trivial to find the hoaxer of the videos. These are two of the most popular videos on the entire internet for the last two years. If you can find the hoaxer of the videos, which also debunkers claim they know all the assets that were used to make the videos, then it should be trivial to find out who made them. Or you can find the plane. If you can find the hoaxer or you can find the plane, then I will delete my entire social media, my ex account. I will let you take my ex. Account away forever. Doesn't this sound like a good deal? Everybody wants me to shut up. Everybody wants me to go to prison. Here is your opportunity. This is your The only reason to not take this opportunity is because you know I'm right. That would be the only reason to dodge. Just like how that coward Sam Tripoli dodged, I just straight up called out Sam Tripoli and he just ran away like the biggest [ __ ] I've ever seen in my entire life. The only reason to dodge is that you're afraid. Sam Tripoli needs my engagement. He's a failed comedian that has way less followers than me and needs a boost. So why is he terrified to talk to me? Oh, because he knows he's gonna get exposed horribly. He knows he's gonna get exposed and nobody's gonna ever listen to him ever again. So, the only reason, so here's the thing. There is no hoaxer of the videos. Let me pull the videos back up. Actually, this is the could not have predicted 20, but he did see it. I'm going to mute it. This is the actual overlaid version of the two videos. So you can see that they're perfectly in sync. By the way, there is no hoaxer of the videos. Number one, there is no hoaxer. So don't come at me with like, oh, the corridor crew said these videos are fake. I really don't give a [ __ ] what some retards on the internet said. Reddit is not a source of truth. Anonymous burner accounts are not a source of truth. And random YouTubers that are [ __ ] are not a source of truth either. None of those things are sources of truth. Mick West is as far from a source of truth as you could possibly be. There is no hoaxer of the MH370 videos. They do not exist. This is absolute proof the videos are real. Unless you can find a hoaxer, the videos got to be real. This is an undeniable claim and a provable one. Either there is a hoaxer or there's not a hoaxer. It doesn't require ambiguity. It doesn't require opinion. If there's no hoaxer, the videos must be real. Okay? That's why that's the standard of proof. It's an objective standard of proof. It's one that doesn't require opinions. It just requires reality. The second thing, there is no plane. This video is real because that is literally MH370. Let me be clear. This isn't a random Boeing trip 7. It's literally Malaysian Airlines. Flight 370 on March 7th, 2014 in the Nicabar Islands. That's what those videos are. They're not graphics. They're not Call of Duty or Unreal Engine. It's literally the plane in its real location while it was being recorded. So, where is the plane? Where is the plane? The experts claim that they know this plane is in the South Indian Ocean. They claim they are 100% sure. This plane is in the South Indian Ocean. Okay. Where where is it? They have searched multiple times and none of the searches have ever found even one piece of debris. Let me be clear. A Boeing 77 has three million parts. 3 million. No search ever found even one piece of debris. Even though they claim to know exactly where the plane went down, they claim the plane went down along the seventh ark based on satellite pins. And they searched the entire seventh arc. Not a little bit of it. They searched the entire seventh ark above water and below water underground or underwater on the on the uh surface of the ocean depths. They searched all of it and they never found one piece of debris. So claiming that you know where the plane is when you never found a single thing that makes it so that if you can't find the plane, again, this is a thing that's just an objective reality. Either you have found the plane or you have not. If you have not found the plane, you cannot claim those videos are fake. Simple as that. The last bits on this is the United States. Government knows 100% what happened to MH370. Let me repeat this. The United States government knows not 99.9% 100% exactly what happened to MH370. Let that sink in. How do I know this? The United States government is objectively, not an opinion, objectively hiding classified information about MH370. How do I know that? I have a 30 plus foyer requests that have been rejected that include but are not limited to the details of the rationale for the MH370 operation by the CIA, which was fully rejected. They also include Edward Lynn's entire case, the guy that leaked the videos. I've identified the person that leaked the videos and I foyed his entire case and it was completely rejected. Not not a little bit rejected, not partial reduction, not redactions, literally rejected in total for national security. Okay. And then the last thing is let me pull. This up. This video is once again. This is again a yes or no thing not an opinion. This is something that can be verified. It's we call it verifiable evidence. This is Gorgon Stair wide area motion imagery produced by the Air Force. This is not uh Blender. This is not Adobe After Effects. This is not Battlefield 6. This is Gorgon Stair wide area motion imagery. That is what it is. And the best part about this is it proves both videos are real. It proves both videos are real because nobody on planet. Earth outside of people in the classified setting knew what Gorgon Stare looked like. Nobody did. I am literally the person that has exposed wide area motion imagery to the world. Nobody even knew what wide area motion imagery was unless they worked in intelligence. And even people in intelligence have no idea what wide area motion imagery is because it's that secret. Because it's that secret. So, you tell me how somebody faked Gorgon stair wide area motion imagery. In 2014, 10 years before me, the first person on the earth, exposed it to the public. There you go. Good luck trying to refute those claims. Good luck trying to meet the bar that's required to prove. Those videos are real because I will be collecting my1 billion dollars from Elon Musk when he's forced to admit those videos are real. Otherwise, we're deleting XAI. I'm actually fine either way. If we can just delete XAI, I'll be happy to be perfectly honest with you guys. So, those videos represent weapons of mass destruction. Weapons of mass destruction. Chat, I have to be honest. I don't know what's right or wrong anymore. And I don't even know if I want to do this anymore. Because the reality is when you're talking about weapons of mass destruction, it's not a joke. It's not a joke at all. And I had a thought. I was sitting there thinking about weapons of mass destruction. There's my pill chat. Okay, my pill chat wasn't showing up. And I thought, I wonder how the classification works. Do you guys want to know how nuclear weapon classification works? I don't care if you want to. You're going to find out right. Now in one way or another. So, here we go. So, I decided last night, you know what? We're going to go on a little quest. How exactly does classification actually work? I wasn't sure. So, this is actually a really good document that talks about somebody who's actually worked uh. I think for the DOE. What did she say she works at? Oh, no. It's a guy. Um, so, interestingly, part of how classification works, I'm going to summarize some of this and we'll look at some of it in detail. There are three levels of classification. Uh, or maybe four. Unclassified, classified or top secret, secret and unc and classified or something like that and maybe unclassified. So maybe like three or four characters. When there's a document, each paragraph in the document will have a different letter next to it. So you can imagine a document that's got U or C or you know TS or whatever it is. And the reason for this is that this makes it easy for them to like edit out parts of the document. So they could say, "Okay, just remove all the top secret stuff from this document and then we can now declassify it. We can now make it available to the public.". Which is actually really smart. And I started thinking about that. I went, "Wow, okay, they've actually developed a classification system that is really hiding information, right? Because you imagine I write a story and now nine. Paragraphs of the story can just be pulled out just like that and only people that have the right classification levels can even see those paragraphs. So now you've created a situation where information is being segmented away from people that would otherwise see it. Right?

And then all of that's arbitrary. Who's deciding whether or not something is a certain classification or another? So this article that I was reading here even mentions like what about a situation where two people are talking to each other? What if the president talks to the the director of national intelligence? Is that classified? And if it is, what level of classification is it set to? So now you can figure out like, oh, there's going to be a lot of arguments internally over what should be the classification of this or that. And while I was reading this, I realized the MH370 videos. No, there is no way anybody can talk about those videos. Like, holy [ __ ] There is no way. Now it made it made so much sense why nobody's talking about those videos because sources and methods are all classified. You can't talk about anything about how they collect information, which means Gorgon stare, which even means the other camera, you're not allowed to talk about any of that stuff. So even if you wanted to talk about the weaponry or what we did to the plane, they can't talk about it because the videos themselves, the the sources and methods themselves are censored. Those themselves are classified. Now, let's take a look at this. Another interesting thing, there's a lot of re really just interesting facts about this that really helped give me like a more comprehensive understanding of what was going on. Um, oops, I just forgot what I was going to say. Um, oh, they said that generally what happens is that people will accumulate a lot of classified information in their heads. So the article says you accumulate all this information and the problem is sometimes you'll accidentally reveal classified information because it's hard to remember. All the different classifications on a document of this is classified at this level. Versus this is classified at this level. So I can talk about this but I can't talk about that. So when leaks of classified information happen, it is common that is incidental. And if it's an incidental leak of classified information, it's considered an administrative situation. What that means is that it's not a situation where you're going to go to jail. So most leaks of classified information are inadvertent. And inadvertent leaks are just administrative, like a slap on the wrist. Like, oh, you're going to get, you know, you're going to get deducted on your uh promotion this year or whatever, right? Like that's basically what administrative means. Somebody I see you guys are already wondering about Eddie about Eddie Lynn. There's a little there's something for this in here. So So I thought, okay, well that's interesting because Edward Lynn, the leaker of the MH370 videos, he got nine years in prison. He got nine years in prison. But I'm reading this document here and it says that most classified leaks are actually just an administrative thing. So for somebody to actually go to prison over it, it must be a really significant effort, right? And let's let's remember the Edward Lynn case. The government ended up having to admit that it was not really an espionage case. They ended up having to drop the charges related to espionage. And he ended up pleading guilty to dissemination of classified information. Dissemination of classified information is what Edward Lynn plead guilty to, which is relevant. That's what we're talking about right here. That's what we're talking about right here. So, if I scroll down, okay, so it's actually S, C, and TS. I got the letters wrong. S for secret, C for confidential, and TS for top secret. So you can imagine these paragraphs that have all these letters near them. Now, this is also interesting. Who decides? It turns out Obama Obama himself is the one that has authored the most recent declassification guidelines, which is executive. Order 13256. Actually, I think this is wrong, right? Isn't this 13526? Isn't that what the real one is? Maybe I I'm looking at a different one. So, it says authority to take certain actions. Say the existence of a weapons program. I mean, this is I'm just going to read this out to you. Pay attention, guys. It's story time. You ready for this? Authority to take certain information. Say the existence of a weapon program and to classify it. Top secret is given only to specific individuals including the president and the vice president and certain agency heads. Wow. So, if we developed a super weapon, if we developed a weapon that was either a nuke, but like, you know, a fusion bomb nuke like we're seeing in the MH370 videos or something related to nuclear weapons, it would require basically the president of the United States to classify it. So, if we developed an autonic fusion implosion bomb, hypothetically speaking, basically Obama would have been had the one to classify it. So definitely Obama must know about this technology. He has to know about this technology. It also later mentions that the president has 100% access to all clearances. So if a document shows up on the president's desk, they can see every single word in the document. What this means is. If there's an MH370 operation, even if it was conducted by the CIA, if that document shows up on the president's desk, he's going to see every single word. He's going to know why we did it. He's going to know the weapon that was used on it. He's going to know everything about it. So, what that means is Obama definitely knows, chat. Obama definitely knows. And it also means that Trump probably knows too. I mean, we've already suspected that, but he probably knows too. So, this is where I'm not going to go to my splinter case right now, but this is where you can see here. It says that this is all basically determined by the Atomic Energy Act and the DOE. The Atomic Energy Act and the DOE. So, can you imagine what I did next? The next thing I did was say, "Show me the [ __ ] statutes.". I said, "Are you kidding me?". I said, 'If this is true, then what if they updated the statutes after they developed a new super weapon? Imagine that you've got regular nukes and then all of a sudden. One day you develop a wormhole weapon, a black hole. What did what did S call it? A plasma disruption fusion weapon. Imagine you develop a plasma disruption fusion weapon and now all of a sudden. You need. New statutes to protect it because it doesn't it. It doesn't classify under the existing statutes because it's too dissimilar from the existing weapons. So I said, "Holy [ __ ] I want to look at what are the specific configurations and and classifications for nuclear weapons from weapons of mass destruction.". So, we're going to get into that in just a second, but this is the last bit I want to show you. I'm going to read this off to you. Remember Edward Lynn when I read this off to you guys right now. Mishandling classified information like Edward what Edward Lynn did, especially if accidental is usually handled as an administrative matter. However, more serious violations can incur criminal charges and penalties. Federal law code, whatever that says, states that anyone who knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location. This is exactly what Edwin Lynn got uh was stuck with. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years. Not more than five years. So you're telling me. If you break a release of classified information, the worst they can hit you with is five years in prison. The absolute worst. And if you guys know anything about the justice uh the part, you know, um the law, like firsttime offenders and things. Like that, usually you only face a fraction of the total sentencing time unless it's an egregious situation. So why did Lynn get nine years? Nine years for Edward Lynn? And I want to point out too that there are two different ways. Charges can work. Charges can either stack up. I got five years for this and I got five years for this. Or it can be concurrent, meaning if you got two charges and they're both. Five years, you only have to serve five years time one time. Usually it's the latter. Usually it's concurrent sentencing. I think I'm saying that right. If I'm not, I apologize. But usually it's that the most you could face is five. Even if you had like three charges of, you know, um retention of uh release of documentation. Now, let's assume the other scenario, though. Even in a situation where there was two charges for for Edward Lynn that he was guilty of, you're still giving him basically the maximum sentence for both of them. You're basically giving him maximum sentence for both of them. Even if we are generous and assume that they would be uh back-to-back sentences. And this is not surprising. This is not surprising because whatever Edward Lynn leaked was such a huge leak of national security that it went all the way up to the joint chiefs of staff. It went to the highest. Levels. Whatever Edward Lynn leaked was so insignificant that it went all the way to the top. And we looked at the appeals. Edward Lynn's appeal argued, he actually made this exact argument. Edward Lynn in his appeal, you can go look it up, says that he was overly sentenced. Overly sentenced compared to similar people with similar charges, which now we saw that. We know that's true. The worst anyone can even possibly get is only five years and he got nine. And so what did the military do in his appeal? It says it says right in the appeal the military had to testify. They had to have military members testify in the appeal as to why what Edward Lynn did was so serious. Why? Because why the hell are you putting why are you coming down on him so hard? They wouldn't show the videos. They wouldn't even show the evidence that he leaked. Why? Because of those MH370 videos. That's the reason why. And yes, they made an example out of it. They made an example out of it.

Okay. So, what else do I have for you, chat? You know what? I just want to get right to the spice. So, I start looking through these penal codes. Let me see if I can pull one of them up here. Let's pull up. I've got them up here for you, chat. Okay, I saved all these out. By the way, I started actually getting scared reading through these documents because I'm looking through these documents and I'm realizing, "Holy [ __ ] This is super serious.". I'm looking through this and I'm like, "Oh yeah, okay. They do not [ __ ] around when it comes to nuclear weapons. They have like 20 different categories of nuclear weapon sensitivity. They call them sigas. Sigas 1 through 20 for example. And uh let me see. I took some notes actually, but I want to show the the big thing. So I had first of all, just as normal guys, I had no idea what to expect when I'm reading this, right? A lot of it's pretty mundane. Some of it's pretty scary. What I'll say as a summary is I found out that even theory is classified. The narrative that like you can talk about theory. No, even nuclear weapon theory is classified like you can't do anything related to nuclear weapons. And so actually I started realizing when I was reading this like you know what I actually have to be careful about talking about making a black hole super weapon because if we push it too far they might actually have real justification to come knocking on the door and like you know if they want to take you know put me in get me in trouble that'd be fine. So here are the sigma categories explained right. Here says sigma categories restricted data and or formally restricted data in the following categories which concern design manufacturer utilization of atomic weapons or utilization of atomic weapons or nuclear explosives. Here are the sigas. Look at sigma one. Sigma. One chat. Look at what sigma 1 says. The very first sigma on the list, hydrodnamic theory of operation. And it calls out hydrodnamic chat. What does hydrodnamic mean? Who in the chat knows what they're referring to when they're talking about hydrodnamic? Oh, they're talking about magneto hydrodnamic. They're talking about plasma. That's what they're talking about right there. They're talking about magneto hydrodnamics. The first sigma. What does this mean? This means that the the connection of plasma to nuclear weapons has to be really old. It must go back to the almost the origins of nuclear classification. Magneto, hydrodnamics, and plasma must go all the way back to the very beginnings of nuclear weapons. Wow. So, I saw that and was like, whoa, that's crazy. That's interesting. And then here's some normal stuff like theory of operation of fishing weapons, manufacturing weapons, Sigma 3. Pretty generic stuff. Here, the logistics of it. Everything about it is classified for for the most part. The effects. Here's another. What was the other interesting thing I saw in here? Um, where's the one about technical? I think maybe further down here. Oh, I don't want to spoil it. Uh purpose of tests, general nature of nuclear explosive tested. Somewhere in here it also mentions like technical experiments of these weapons which could the MH370. Videos could qualify as like a technical experiment of it. And it even mentions like in the classification they talk about footage. I guess what I'm getting at is. When I was reading through this, I thought, you know what? They are recording every time they use. One of these weapons, they're recording it. That's why they were recording MH370. They were recording it because they record every nuclear weapon test. They record every single nuclear weapon test. And all of them are classified. All of them are classified at the highest levels. Let's scroll down just a little bit more. This is where I just went, "Holy shit.". What does Sigma 11. Say, chat? What does Sigma 11. Say? Information concerning inertial confinement fusion which reveals or ind is indicative of weapon data. Holy [ __ ] There it is. Yatsi. Let's go, baby. Are you kidding me? Right there. Bingo. Sigma 11. Information concerning inertial confinement fusion which reveals or is indicative of weapon data. Literally the thing that Friedwart Winterberg's textbook says on the first page, the thing that I've been going on podcast, you can watch the resilient podcast, resilient show that went that went live on Monday where I said Fryar Winterberg's textbook says on page one, inertial confinement fusion has been kept secret for national security and that that's the reason why the world doesn't have UNL unlimited green energy right now. And there it is. There it is right there. And just spelled out. Spelled out. Oh. Yeah. Yeah. We got to play it. We got to play. Holy [ __ ] Where is it? Boom. Gotcha, [ __ ] I mean, holy crap. I was just looking at this. I'm just absolutely dumbfounded cuz. Once again, I didn't know what I was going to expect. I wouldn't expect to just be spelled out right in the policy spelled out. I thought it would be like coded language. Or, you know, you're going to have to dig to find the true rea. Nope, there it is right there. Boom. Wow. Okay, let me see what I got over here. So, I found another thing here, too. Restricted data. Is that Is it in this one or is it in the other document? I can't remember. I got two documents up here. Where's restricted? Is this it? All right, here it is. It's right here. Wait, is this is that the right one? Oh, this is different. Let me. Where's their other restricted data? Here it is. Is this the same one? Okay. Yeah, restricted data. So, restricted data is something. Eric Weinstein has talked about. In fact, I might have a clip. Let me see if I have a clip. No, I don't have it. So, Eric Weinstein talks about restricted data. Restricted data basically means it's born secret. Means you don't even have to classify it. You don't even have to classify it. Because the moment you talk about it, it's automatically secret. So what does this say right here about restricted data? Let's read this. The data which is defined in section 11Y of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended as all data concerning design, manufacturer or utilization of atomic weapons, the production of special nuclear material or wait for it, the use of special nuclear material in the production of energy. The uh the use of special nuclear material in the production of energy right there. You want to know how are they keeping free energy secret from the world? How and why are they keeping fusion secret from the world? It's literally spelled out right there in the restricted data paragraph. Any fuel source, any fuel source that is nuclearbased that produces energy is classified. It's classified as restricted data. Holy [ __ ] But shall not include data declassified or removed from the restricted data category. So, we look at this and for the people out there that are going, "Holy shit.". I mean, imagine what I was thinking yesterday when I'm reading this. I'm just reading this and I'm going, "Okay, yeah, we're right. We're right.". Like, we're 100% right. There's no way you can just randomly guess exactly how the classifications, the restrictions are all working. Energy, literal energy is classified under restricted data. It's not just, oh, the the big booms are classified. No, literally production of energy is classified. This actually made me even wonder. It's possible. It's possible that the helium 3, the boron 11, the fuel sources. In a neutronic fusion, they might be classified. And there's another this is a crazy thought. This is pretty. This is let's call this a stretch. There might be another fuel source. What if there's another fuel source that is not boron 11 that is not helium 3 that is an autronic fusion source that is used for thermonuclear weapons and what if it's kept secret all the time everywhere because it is related to nuclear weapons? Somebody guessed it already. What would that be? What could that fuel? Have we heard of any other fuel sources that could be used potentially that we haven't seen a lot of data on but that have been speculated with relation to nuclear weapons? There is one lithium. Lithium. I sprinkled a little lithium in there. Castle Bravo. Test. Sprinkle a little boron and lithium. When we added the lithium to our boron, all of a sudden. The nuclear detonation went from six megatons to 15 megat tons. This is documented by RTOR in the Castle Bravo tests. So, we know there's a connection to lithium to thermonuclear weapons, but when you look out there, there's almost no literature about it. But you can get Grock and AI to spit back. And in fact, it was Friedwart Winterberg's textbook. I I'm I'm so happy. I read a thermonuclear weapons textbook. It just it gave me so much clarity over a lot of this. His textbook says if you add a lithium lithium to your dutyium reaction, you can basically get a chain reaction that just keeps persisting. Do you get what I'm saying? As in add a little lithium to your thermonuclear detonation and the byproducts filter back in and they cause the reaction to just keep going. So lithium might be the thing that they're hiding. They might actually be hiding another fuel source related to lithium and they might even have used it on the plane. Now it's not requirement. We don't know for sure. They probably have used multiple different fuel sources. But what if lithium is actually one of these sources, one of these fuels? And what if it was related to what they did to the plane? Pretty crazy, guys. This is like crazy documents. So, I will share these documents with you guys uh in the in um. The Discord for you guys later tonight if you want to read them yourself. I do recommend reading them because I think it's so important when you're an investigator, when you're researching to really understand the context. We need to understand like how is stuff classified? How do they categorize things? One more thing I found out about this. Was they updated the um which one was it? I think I think it's the one that I mentioned about like critical nuclear weapons. They updated the uh policy in 2011 in 2013. So a lot of these policies, hello Lauren. A lot of these policies got updated around 2011 and 2013 while Obama was in office. And why I thought that was significant was because I went, "Wait a minute. If we developed wormhole technology, this would have all been classified under the Atomic Secrecy Act under these same provisions. So what if they changed and updated the policies because we developed a new super weapon in the 2000s and so then Obama gets put into office. He redes all the security document all the security policies because why? Because now we've got a brand new super weapon. Now we've got a brand new super weapon and we need to categorize it correctly. Okay, cool.

So now, if you guys are interested in that, if you thought that was, you know, enjoyable, check out those documents. I'll put them in the Discord later. And if you find anything else interested in there, because there might be more juicy tidbits. I mean, I kind of glossed through it. I found some good stuff in there, but who knows? There might even be more stuff in there. The things that we should be looking for, like I found, uh, also like certain people in the DOE can actually classify or determine if something's going to be secret or not secret. Um, so there is some ambiguity, but ultimately just like everybody's been saying in the UFO community, the classification, everything falls to the DOE, the Department of Energy. I will put a Discord invite in the chat. When we finish up here tonight, guys. Okay, let me just see if there's anything else. I wanted to touch on for related to that. Yeah. Uh, yeah. Okay, that's it about for that. Okay. So the uh and you know just if you missed the last live stream. We talked about John Knuckles who was one of the people that optimized the thermonuclear detonations to to remove or reduce at least the neutrons which is the heat the radiation that comes off of nukes. So what are you left with when you remove the neutrons? I think you're left with a ball of energy which could manipulate spaceime. Now, the other video we're going to take a look. At here is Hal Pudof tonight, guys. If you are not familiar with Hal Pudof, Hal Pudof is former CIA and he's also former Defense Intelligence Agency. He's former Stanford research institute. He's former remote viewer or remote viewing um scientist and he's the world's leading expert on zero point energy. So, I'm digging around trying to find the clip. It's been a while, I guess, I didn't uh didn't pull it up here. Uh where is it? Oh, here it is. Okay. Almost 25 years old. Actually is 25 basically this here. That's the man right there. That's the goat chat. This is the goat the OG zero point energy goat how pud off this interview here from the year 2000 25 years ago. Here's Hal Pudof talking to Stephven Greer 25 years ago talking about zero point energy. Yo, you think his his hair is fake? Let me look. It does kind of look fake, but I think it's probably real. Who knows? So, Hal Pudof looks old as [ __ ] in this video. Hal Pudof looks old as [ __ ] in this video, and he's still alive now, 25 years later. He actually doesn't even look that much different 25 years later. This is the part where I was kind of rude. Obviously to Scott Adams, Dilbert writer, but Scott Adams is dying from cancer. Scott Adams, what is he in his 60s? How old is he? Uh. 19 68 years old. Scott Adams is only 68 years old. Hal Pudof in this video is older than Scott Adams is now. And he's still alive. It's still alive. This is why I say people. Like Scott Adams, they have suicidal ignorance. It's a new word, new phrase that I just came up with. New word, new buzzwords. Today, chat. Sigma. 11. Sigma 11 sounds dope as [ __ ] And then also suicidal ignorance. Suicidal ignorance is you are literally going to die because you don't believe in science. You don't believe in science. Do you really think guys all these nuclear engineers John Knuckles is still alive? Dude was working on A-bombs in the 60s and he's still alive right now. He was working on A-bombs 30 years before I was born. H bombs 30 years before I was born and he's still alive now. These dudes are living multiple standard deviations longer than life expectancy. They're all John Kramer, George Miley, these guys are all alive and they're all deep into their 90s. Life expectancy in the United States is 76 years old. These dudes are living 20 plus years beyond life expectancy. And all it would take is people like Scott Adams to wake up to the fact that they've got all this classified technology which is not just energy production. There's almost certainly life extens life extension andor longevity related to this technology as well. And that's at least my personal opinion. Or these guys just happen to know the secrets of how to eat right to live an extra 20 or 30 years. Plus, Halputo is like not just is. He not only is he in his 90s, but he's still going and doing talks and conferences and all this stuff. So, suicidal ignorance is literally dying of cancer when we probably have the cure for cancer hidden and all it would take is you to wake up to zero point energy. That's all it would take. Let's listen to the goat chat. I I've I've ranted long enough today. Hope it's loud enough. Let's let's start by talking about zero point energy since you're one of the leaders in that field. You know, I'd love to just get a really basic present. The first question, what is 0 point energy? Right? This is the most basic question. What is zero point energy? Come on. Empty at all. It's actually full of energy. So instead of being like. So space is not empty at all. It's filled. The very first thing he says, very first thing Hal Pudof says is space is not empty. It's filled with energy. Okay, we can't hear the question, but you can hear how puto off pretty well. Here you go. Kind of a quiet empty lake. It's more like the froth at the base of a waterfall or something. And this energy is basically electromagnetic in nature. And uh the energy density is uh quite high. In fact, it's so high that when it was first discovered mathematically, it was thought to be some kind of artifact of mathematics. But then as time went on, there were even Nobel Prize winning experiments that showed that this energy in so-called empty space was really there. We don't usually notice it because um it's so homogeneously distributed. It sort of be like sitting in a bathtub with uh at exactly your body temperature. You might not notice notice the water, but under certain circumstances, it can be um disturbed or perturbed and then it has has effects. So he's saying it's electromagnetic. We have this electromagnetic energy. When the energy density was calculated, it was so high that they didn't believe it. They didn't believe it. They tried to calculate this energy density and it was so massive, they thought, "No, this can't be real.". And so, Halos says, "How is that possible?". Because it's in equilibrium. It's homogeneously distributed. Homogeneously distributed means it's basically in equilibrium like a a calm ocean, calm lake. Everything's in balance. But if you rip it out of balance, now you can interact with. How do we rip it out of balance? How do we rip? How do we churn up the zero point energy? Well, it's electromagnetic in nature. If the zero point energy is electromagnetic in nature, then we just need to use electromagnetism interact with it. As I mentioned, some some effects on atomic emission, for example, is what eventually ended up in a Nobel Prize for Willis Lamb of Yale University. It's called the lamb shift. This is a recognition that in fact this energy disturbs atoms. So atoms aren't sitting in a void. They're sitting in a sea of energy. Atoms are not sitting in a void. What he's saying there is atoms are not sitting in empty space. They're sitting in a sea of energy. This is Hal Pudof's 1987 paper, ground state of the hydrogen atom. That's literally what he was arguing. Ground state of the hydrogen atom. How Pudof argues every atom is actually exchanging energy with the zero point. Energy all the time. All the time. Remember this is from 2000. Nobody in 2000 knew that 0 point energy was real. Like everybody everybody. If you talked to them about zero point energy in 2000, they'd have thought you're talking about sci-fi. Nonsense, they'd be like, "Yeah, what about the flux magnator, right?". They they would make a joke about Star Trek. Hal. Pud's not joking here. Hal Pud's 100% serious here. So once uh quantum theorists realized that energy was there, the next question was, well, is there any way to tap it? And it was thought originally that probably not. It might be like trying to tap the heat energy around us. And uh you can quickly prove for thermodynamic reasons that uh it'll take more energy to tap it than you'd get out of it so that you don't come out ahead. But back in about 1984, a researcher at Hughes Laboratory by the name of Robert Ford forward uh showed that there was a particular effect called the Casmir effect which demonstrated that in fact this energy could be tapped even though on a minuscule basis to start and that is if you put up two metal plates um. It slightly shields the region in between just like car might shield radio signals coming in and uh because this energy comes from all sides if it's slightly shielded in the interior portion between a couple of plates. These plates will get pushed together and that's Casemir force pulls place together and then when they hit they. Create heat. So we've actually converted some of this vacuum energy into heat. But when you go look at the numbers the case effect the casemir effect shows that we actually can take this energy and convert it into heat. So this energy can be turned to useful work. So the big lie that you hear from people, though I've done a good job of dispelling it, is okay, yes, the 0 point energy is real, but it's insignificant. Well, that's [ __ ] It's not insignificant. The next thing they say is, well, there's no way to get work out of it. There's no way to get energy out of the zero point. That's also [ __ ] The Casemir effect proved Hendrickk Casemir. 1948 proved that it's there. And then so who does Hal Pudof name drop? We need to remember these names. He name drops Robert Forward. Robert Forward. He says Robert Forward showed you could use the Casemir effect to charge a battery. This proves doesn't theoretically I mean 100% proves at least on a theoretical basis that you can use the Casmir effect to produce real energy. That means there's actually something there and you're actually tapping into it. That's what that means. Robert Forward is was the mentor of Eric W. Davis. Eric W. Davis is currently Al Pudof's rightand man. Right-hand man. Author of six of the defense intelligence reference documents, six of them. Eric W. Davis, his mentor was Robert Forward.

You find out that there's enough energy in the of a coffee cup to evaporate all the world's oceans if you could. So, how much energy is there? Enough energy in the empty space of a coffee cup to vaporize all the Earth's oceans, aka. A shitload of energy, get it all out. So, this raised the issue among uh theorists, well, can we manipulate this energy? Uh could we attack it for spaceflight application, for example? And um there a couple ways to go. Could we get propulsion out of it? Could we use it as an energy source? And so these are the areas that modern theorists are looking at. One of the consequences is is that um the idea that well it could be manipulated and distorted in such ways to get propulsion out of it. And this has led to the concept of what's called the alub warp track. A cubier is a well-known general relativity theorist. I remember hearing that for the first time. He goes, "Okay, we're going to try to see if we can pull some of this energy out.". And when we were doing this, it led to the theory of the Alcubi warp drive. Miguel Alubi 1991. Basically says, okay, we've got that flat ocean. We're looking at this flat ocean of 0 point energy. And he says, well, if we just make an asymmetry in it, a wave. If we make a wave in this zero point energy, we can just surf the wave. Then we're not moving at all. Just like if I'm on a surfboard, I'm not moving on the surfboard. The surfboard is just floating on the wave. We can do the exact same thing with the zero point energy, which is the equivalent of doing the exact same thing with spacetime itself. If we manipulate spacetime itself, we can make an asymmetry and we can ride the wave. Ride the gravity wave. We can ride the gravity wave. So, this right here was the moment whether or not you're a new follower or you've been following for a while. This was the moment when I watched this two years ago. I went, "Holy [ __ ] The answer is 0 point energy because I already knew that it was Miguel Alubberry's warp drive. Metric was the answer just from stuff that I had seen and researched. But then to hear that they said, "Oh, this when we were working through 0, that's what came up with the theory of the warp drive.". It's like, oh [ __ ] It's not some. There's not like a million different theories about how warp drives and wormholes are possible. There's just one. It's zero point energy. Zero point energy is the answer. And that's the reason why today I'm a zero point energy influencer. Two years ago when I figured this out was the day that I decided, holy [ __ ] I'm going to become a zero point energy influencer because that's the secret to that's the underlying basis to all of this. How is free energy real? How is warp drive real? How's wormholes real? Zero point energy. Zero point energy is all the answers. And he posed himself an interesting question. He said, um, well, everybody's heard of Star Trek. Could warp drive Allah Star Trek be obtained at least in principle uh without violating any physics just standard straight textbook physics that was one constraint. Uh he wanted to know could he uh beat the speed of light but he have breakfast here go to Alpha Century for lunch and come back for dinner. Uh another thing is that he wanted to avoid uh time problems. For example, he'd like to have breakfast with his wife and children go have lunch come back and not be talking to his great great great grandchildren. And also could he do it in such a way that he wasn't turned into salsa on the back of the spaceship due to massive acceleration. He actually found that there were solutions that would permit you to do it in principle and published them in um regular general relativity journals. That's a good news. Bad news is the energy it would take to do that is so out of sight that you know there's no way we're going to do it on the original basis of the original calculation. So he says, "Okay, you know what? Not only were we able to do the math, show that we can make a wave. Not only could we make a wave, but we can actually explain it in general relativity terms.". He says, "We can take Einstein's equations and we can explain how we can make a gravity wave.". Aa aka we can prove that Einstein was right. We can prove that he was right that gravitational waves are real. That's what he thought. He says, "We can show this.". But then they find out, "Uhoh, there's a problem. What's the problem? The energy requirements are too high.". We do the math and we find out, okay, but the energy requirement to bend. Spaceime is like the mass of Jupiter. Oh, well, that's a problem, right? We don't have the mass of Jupiter hanging around. So therefore, we can't do it. It must be fake. And if you actually ask people today, that is the number one answer. You'll get back from any PhD physicist. That's a normie. Any normie PhD physicist. The number one answer you'll get back. Is they'll say, "Well, the energy requirements are too high.". But what did we just review? We were just reviewing nuclear weapons, thermonuclear weapons, and we found out. Everything is classified, including energy production. Energy production is classified. So, and what did we just find out about lithium or what did I say about lithium? Lithium might have a runaway chain reaction where it just keeps going and going and going. So, when I go, hey, where could we get a whole bunch of energy? Anyone know where we could get like a huge amount of energy? Oh, thermonuclear weapons sounds like the perfect place to get a whole bunch of energy, right? And recently, I mean, when I say recently, I mean probably a few years after this interview, Matt Visser, I believe is actually from my alma moater. Uh, Matt Visser comes around and says, "Actually, we can reduce the energy requirement.". We can reduce the energy requirement. How? Make it so that your wormhole has no throat. So in the Star Trek movies, you got your wormhole opens up over here, right? And you go in your wormhole and then you're like flying around in the wormhole. Here we go. And then you come out the other side. Matt Visser says you're not going to have a throat in your wormhole. Instead, you're just literally connecting two points in spaceime flatfaced wormhole. Almost like you're doing a cut and paste and moving this over here. That will drastically reduce the energy requirements. And I I think there's multiple different kinds of worm. I think what they call it is a polyhedral wormhole, like a cutting out of spaceime. And how much does this reduce the energy requirements to to an arbitrarily small amount of energy? This is a direct quote from Eric W. Davis. Eric W. Davis says, "Matt Visser showed that the energy requirements for the wormhole can be reduced to an arbitrarily small amount.". And this is where you should watch the Salvatore. Py interview from this last Sunday because we were talking and basically what came out. This is where I think we probably pushed national security. The furthest was where we determined it may be possible to achieve the Schwinger limit which is potentially the limit where spaceime breaks down. It's possible to red to reduce the swinger limit. Basically say if we create this huge amount of energy, we hit the ceiling. Once we hit this ceiling, boom, you've now bent spacetime. And s basically said there may be ways where we can make that ceiling come down. Make that ceiling go down. And one of those answers may be superconductivity. Maybe superconductivity. We're going to leave it especially theoretical right here because I just finished reading all the classifications about nuclear weapons. And we've definitely been pushing the limit. We've definitely been pushing the limit. Okay, let's get back to the video. Since then, some theorists have found some shortcuts and have reduced the energy requirement. So, instead of needing uh the energy of the galaxy, we're down to the energy of maybe Jupiter mass or whatever. But it still shows a kind of uh thinking that's opening up in the field. And so NASA who started a breakthrough propulsion physics program looking for alternatives to to uh firing up spaceships. Uh have set up a very avantgard program not spending a lot of money on it. But basically they want to be hopefully inundated with ideas some of which might bear fruition. And so in fact uh we've had a number of meetings. I've hosted one myself uh at a major meeting at the Glenn Research. Wait, he Hal hosted one of the breakthrough physics propulsion meetings himself. Of course he did. What am I even thinking? Of course he did. Breakthrough physics propulsion. This is probably one of the very very important NASA experiments or let's say um conferences. For several years, they had some of the top physicists come together, including John Kramer, Eric W. Davis, and Hal Pudof. They all came together and they started researching all these topics. And I put I put the big web up on my Twitter a while back. You can look at it of all the different concepts. Negative energy, vacuum extraction, warp, they're all considered viable. All considered viable. The other thing I want to point out here is that now that we know about classifications, we also know that Hal Pudof is buried in NDAs. Imagine that Hal Pudof had seen something like the MH370 operation. If Hal Pudof had seen an operation where we used a weapon like this, he would never be able to talk about it ever because it's never going to be declassified. And what this would mean is that in his mind while he's talking all the time, he can never reference anything where we saw one of those TS's or C's or whatever, right? He can never mention that. Now, even think back to what S's been saying. When when I've interviewed S, realize that we now know what it looks like when somebody has NDAs. When somebody has a bunch of NDAs where they've seen classified information and they can't reveal the classified information, then they have to be careful every time what they're saying. They have to be careful is, oh, did I see that in a document where it had a little letter next to it? Because if I did, I can't talk about it. So, they have to speak in extremely generic terms and they can only speak about certain topics that are safe where they know they're not going to get in trouble. There's no chance they're going to accidentally inadvertently reveal some classified information. Now, just for a second, I want to show something else because I want you. I'm going to show you this. I'm gonna show you this. I get that question. This right here is President Donald Trump. This is This is the interview that Trump did with Joe Rogan. Now, keep in the back of your mind that Donald Trump 100% has seen documents that have the little letters next to them, and he can't talk about anything where the letters say, which means that anytime a topic comes up where he's seeing classified information, he has to be careful about exactly what he says. Now, let's see what Donald Trump says here when he gets asked about aliens. As much as almost any question. Do you I get that question as much as almost any question. Do you think that we have aliens coming, you know, flying around or whatever? What do you think? There's no reason not to. I mean, there's no reason. Not to think that Mars and all these planets don't have life, you know, because Well, Mars, we've had probes there and rovers and I don't think there's any life there. Well, maybe it's life that we don't know, but maybe. Maybe there was life there at one point in time. This is a speculation about Mars that Mars had an atmosphere at one point. Joe Rogan is lecturing the president of the United States who has the highest possible security clearance where he had to be careful about the alien question, right? He get I get asked that question and you can see he's like, okay, how am I going to respond to this question? How can I respond to this question in an unclassified way? And what does he say? He says, "There's no reason to believe that Mars and all these planets don't have life on them.". This is This clip is so insane in retrospect because two days ago NASA admitted there's life on Mars. Bacterial life, but life nonetheless. And here's this here is Donald Trump like not even a year ago. I don't even think this is a year old out here going, "Hey, there's no reason to believe there's not life on Mars.". That is such a crazy thing for someone to say a year ago, and now it's been confirmed. The people in the replies were were watching this going, "Holy shit.". And why is Joe Rogan acting so weird? I mean, I don't think Joe Rogan's a plant, but this is a really weird thing to be cutting the president off about this and be like, "No, no, no. There, God, there's no life on Mars.". He's like, "No, there's no life on Mars. We sent probes up there. We sent probes up there. There's no life on Mars.". Like, bro, did you watch Ashton Forbes's live stream? I mean, granted, I it was yesterday, but if you watch my live stream, to claim there's no evidence of life on Mars is insane. There's been evidence of life on Mars for a long ass time. Whether or not you give it a lot of credibility, that's a different thing. But to say we sent probes up there and we didn't. What do you mean the Viking rover found organics in 1976? Viking rover found organics in 1976. You're telling me we sent probes up there. We didn't find anything? Weird. I don't think there's any life there. Well, maybe it's life that we don't know. But maybe maybe there was life there at one point in time. This is a speculation about Mars that Mars had an atmosphere at one point in time a long time ago that could support life. It also had large bodies of water, but we've had no evidence of even bacterial life that exists on Mars. But no evidence of bacterial life that exists on Mars. I mean, this did not age well for Joe Rogan at all. We've now have, by the way, guys, less than one year. Later, we now have confirmation of bacterial life on Mars. Less than one year later. And Donald Trump even tries to to step in and go, maybe it's life. We're like we're not familiar with. Like he's almost like he's saying that he knows there's bacterial life on Mars. And Joe Rogan's going fullon Redditor. Actually, actually, we checked and sent probes up there and there's no life anywhere on Mars. A dead planet. Nothing going on there. Nothing growing around on Mars. Wow, dude. That clip, I hope that in the next Joe Rogan where they have to I don't know. Whenever Joe Rogan talks about this Life on Mars thing, I hope Jamie plays that clip. And it would be even better if he plays this live stream of that clip of me just [ __ ] on Joe Rogan.

Uh because wow, bro. Did not age well. Did not age well. And then the last thing is Trump. Must know, man. Why? It's so random for Trump to be like, "Yeah, what? There's no reason not to think there's life on Mars and maybe. It's not like we think. Maybe it's not life like what we think, but there's still something out there.". Wow. So Trump definitely knows. I'm I'm 100% convinced that Trump knows about aliens. He knows about the orbs and the and uh the fusion bomb technology. I think he knows about all of it. I think he knows about all of it. And this is where people would said. Before Trump got elected, the UFO community, especially the woke half of the UFO community, they would all say, "If Trump knew about it, he would blab about it. Trump can't keep quiet about anything. He would be blabbing about the aliens. He would be blat. He literally is. He literally went on Joe Rogan and he was blabbing about it. He went on Joe Rogan. He's like, "Yep, there's life on Mars.". He just said it and everybody just ignored it. And then the the funniest part is after he blabs, like after he says, "We have weapons nobody understands. We're way more powerful.". Then the same exact people the same exact people said he would talk about it if he did. He goes, "No, he's just exaggerating.". That's what Trump does. He just lies. He just exaggerates. It's like, bro, you're the one who just said if he knew he would say it and now he is saying it and you're going, "Nah, he's lying.". I mean, you can't have it both ways, man. You can't have it both ways. Is it that Trump will blab about it or that Trump's not going to blab about it and make up a fake story about it? It's like, this is the problem. The goalposts are just constantly moving. So, I'm of the opinion that when Trump says stuff, when he's talking about weapons that nobody understands, he's talking about aliens, we should be listening to him. We should be listening to what he says because he's the president of the United States. With the highest classifications where if any document gets on his desk, he has full access to it. Full access. So, we've learned a lot today. A lot. We're not going to be able to get through this whole interview, but I want to play a little bit more of this center in Cleveland. Out of that uh came a program in which proposals were asked for and provided and a certain number of physicists did get some support to carry out experiments just to see if it looked like it was going to lead anywhere in this direction. One of the experiments that was funded by this program is a program on uh is an experiment to investigate driving something with a zero point energy source. Well, to start it's just uh can you drive a little oscillator, a little casmir oscillator. So, it's it's really kind of looking at the fundamentals to see if we have the fundamentals right. We're still decades away, maybe centuries away, even if these experiments are successful. Mask off moment right there, chat. That was the mask off moment. We might actually end the stream here off this moment right there. What he just said there, he said that NASA breakthrough propulsion. He said there were several proposals that were put put in. After that and some of those proposals, one of those proposals was about using the kasmir effect to produce propulsion. This is basically the EM drive. This is not exactly the same but it's really similar concept to the EM drive, the impossible drive. And I looked at those proposals. One of the proposals, if I remember correctly, is from John Kramer. John Kramer himself, I think, got one of those proposals. But then what does he say? He says, "We're just doing it. We're just experimenting the with the theory. We're just experimenting with the theory right now. These ideas are decades away, maybe centuries away. He let the mask slip for a second. He let the mask slip for a second. These technologies are centuries away. They were not going to reveal this technology ever. They were never ever ever going to reveal this technology. And this is the most powerful evidence in my opinion. This is circumstantial, the most powerful circumstantial. Evidence that not even the government faked the MH370 videos. The reason why the government didn't fake the MH370 videos is because they were never going to reveal that technology. Nobody had ever seen space-time manipulation and they were never going to show it to people. They were going to keep it secret forever. In fact, if you look at the UFO community, even now in 2025, there is absolutely no appetite whatsoever to reveal this technology. The very same people that believe the aliens are visiting us and all this other [ __ ] have no interest, no curiosity over how those same aliens are getting here. None. They just think it's magical alien technology, just magical alien physics. The aliens are just so much smarter than us. They just they just know stuff that we can't humans can't possibly understand. This is why I say that disclosure is never going to happen. All this [ __ ] you're seeing in the media, it's all a circus. It's all a show to intentionally accomplish nothing. As long as everybody's talking about the aliens are real, the aliens are videos. We can't know what I'm looking at in this video. It must be a balloon. As long as people are talking about that stupid [ __ ] Nobody's talking about the real questions that matter. What is the energy source of your UFO? It's a neutronic fusion. It's inertial confinement fusion. It's literally classified under sigma 11. Literally classified under sigma 1 and sigma. 11. Sigma 1. Magneto hydrodnamics. Sigma. 11. Inertial confinement fusion literally classified for nuclear secrets and they had no appetite. Not even Hal Pudof. Even Hal Pudof the goat himself right here saying you might get you might get some of this wormhole technology or free energy technology in a hundred years. In a hundred years we might give it to you. Now I think the reality is that they will give it to us when the adversaries figure it out. When the adversaries like China and Russia figure it out and they start deploying it all of a sudden the United States will Oh. Yeah, we got that too. Yeah, we've had some of that. Oh, you got a lollipop? Our lollipop's better. Here you go. That's probably or in like a significant war. But even in the case of a war, this is kind of the sickest thing. I think they would let us get hit by a dirty bomb. They would let us they would let a major city get wiped out by a nuke before they would deploy before they would expose this technology publicly. That's my biggest fear of all. This is that it's so secret that they're so protective of this technology that they will let millions of people die to keep it secret. I think that's what scares me the most about this whole situation. So what can we do? What do we do about this? We know there's this zero point energy. We can tap into it for free energy. Free energy. The zero point energy is probably what the source of fusion is. If you can produce a coherent ball of plasma. That's self-stabilizing. How is it self-stabilizing? Because all the atoms are exchanging energy with a zero point energy all the time to me. I mean, I don't even know how we get this out, chat. I don't even know at this point. Like, you look around and you see the ignorance. You see the suicidal ignorance. You see the people like Sam Tripoli who's one of the biggest conspiracy people on the planet making posts like Ashton's wrong again. Like we are just straight up cooked. Even the people that should be open to these ideas, it's just so far over their head that they just don't get it at all. And this is why I made the post that humanity does not deserve free energy. We are definitely going to destroy ourselves with this technology. In fact, I understand why the woke disclosure government is hiding it. I mean, it makes sense. Look at how divisive we are. Look at all the [ __ ] political gaslighting that's going on 247. Of course, we're gonna annihilate ourselves with this technology. [ __ ] If you gave it, if you gave me the decision, I might be like, "Okay, we're just going to plug right back into the matrix.". Like, forget this technology. We're going to forget about all this technology. We're just going to go back to the Amish times. We're going to go back to the simple times where it's just horse and buggy moving around. No technology for anybody because the moment we get access to technology, we become monsters. Literal monsters. Okay guys, I we're going to cut it there. Um, thank you guys so much. Let me do some of these donos and then uh I'll I'll put a link to the Discord in here as well. And then I'll put those papers uh in the Discord. If you guys find anything else, uh, tag me in the Discord or you can DM it to me if you want as well, but preferably just tag it because I have a feeling. We're going to find even more stuff in there. I think we're going to find even more stuff. Oh, but Ashley, the last thing I'll say is that how we get this out is everybody enough. People have to wake up to it, right? Enough people have to wake up and then once everybody wakes up to it, everyone's just going to pretend like they knew the whole time. Like mark this down. This is how it's going to play out. Everybody's going to ridicule this idea, all this [ __ ] And then once it becomes unavoidable, they'll all be like, "Oh yeah, of course we all knew 0 point energy was real. We always knew 0 point energy was real. We just had to do this one experiment and give this guy the Nobel Prize. We just we didn't have the experimental data to believe in it yet.". They're all going to pretend like they were always on board with zero point energy. That's what they're gonna do because how do I know that? Because that's how the human condition works every single time. Just like with the Iraq war where everybody's supporting the Iraq war and the yellow cake uranium and then we find out it's all a big sham and then everybody goes, "I never supported the Iraq war. Who would who would have supported the Iraq. War? Nobody. Nobody ever supported the Iraq war.". It's going to be the same exact thing when we get with the zero point energy. So just get ready for it, chat. Get ready for it. And that's I think part of the reason why there's the systematic coordinated attacks on my character because they can't let me get credit. They can't let me get credit for this. Even if I get partial credit for this, then people are going to be like, "Oh [ __ ] This Ashen Forbes guy knew about Zero Point Energy. How did he know about that?". Oh, cuz the MH370 videos. Because he's literally 247 saying these videos are real and that's how he figured everything out. So, they've got to somehow marginalize me to a degree where somebody else can come in and and pretend to make the discovery so that they can be like, "Oh, this person made the discovery. This is a person. They're a good person.". Ashton's an evil person. Don't believe what Ashton said because he's evil. We're not gonna tell you why. He just he he hurts people. He's bad. But this person is good. They're the ones who figured it all out. That's what's gonna happen, chat.

Okay, Jan, thank you very much for this donation. Appreciate you. Says, "I have collected knowledge for 25 years about everything.". That is awesome. I appreciate it. And I'm glad. There are other people who are doing this. I'm not out here trying to say I'm the first person to do this. I'm probably just one of the more successful ones. But other people have been researching this, doing a lot of work, and man, many people have figured it out, too. I'm not the first person to figure it out. Not any of these things. So, credit to all you goats out there. All you secret goats out there who have been researching zero point energy. Like, I'll just shout out like Nim Heramine, for example. Credit to you, man. Seriously, like bravo to be on this way before everybody else was. Wall-E hot sauce. Don't let them drain your energy. Does it seem like. I'm. My energy is drained, chat, the thing about it is you can have every person attacking me. You can have conspiracy people attacking me, UFO people attacking me. It doesn't work on me. These other people like DSA, this dude was having a psychological break yesterday. He was having a psychological break because of all the people attacking him. Doesn't work on me at all. You could have the whole world attacking me. And it would have it wouldn't even phase me a little bit. Not even a little bit. Maybe that's my superpower. Who knows? Thank you very much for that donation though. Lupazon.com, can you lay out what evidence rules out perhaps unknown non US military forces? The best evidence for why we're looking at a US military operation is we're literally looking through classified military surveillance. And the military surveillance in question is drones. Now, when we thought it might be a satellite video, because it's literally called satellite video, literally called satellite video, then it was possible that we just inadvertently caught the plane getting zapped by some orbs, right? Because, oh, we've got satellites everywhere. We just happen to catch it. But once we found out it's not a satellite video, once we found out there's a drone above the plane, there's a drone above the plane. Chat recording with whammy with cameras on the wings. A drone above the plane above a random. Boeing trip 7. That's on fire off its main course in the middle of the ocean. Why is that drone up there, chat? Why is there a drone above a missing plane? There's only one answer. And why is there a second drone? Why is there a second drone horizontal to the plane? Delta, don't sue me. Why is there a second drone staring at the plane like this and another drone up here? Why do you think chat? There is only one answer. And this is why these videos, why the MH370 videos are. The thing that nobody will talk about because they are recorded in such a way that it 100% implicates the US government. The only reason why that drone is that and it's not just like looking at the plane. It's right next to the plane. It flies under the wake of the plane. That drone intercepted the plane. Why? Because it's an operation. The whole thing was planned out. The whole thing was a planned operation. That's the evidence that in my mind conclusively proves that the orbs are a United States weapon. And I'm somebody that would have easily believed that those orbs were alien if the circumstantial evidence led to that. But it doesn't. It doesn't. And this is also why they're not talking about it. If that was random aliens zapping the plane, Jeremy Corbel, that grifter piece of crap, would have been in my DMs begging me to be a whistleblower for him and go on all his stupid TV show. So he could do all his sensationalized drama and talk about how the aliens zapped MH370 and maybe they're in the negative dimension with the aliens getting butt raped, right? He would have loved that crap. But Jeremy Corbel knew right away. There was not alien zapping that plane. He knew right away. That's not aliens zapping that plane. It is the United States government. And that's why no one will talk about it. It's a combination of sources and methods, a literal black operation, literal black operation conducted by the CIA or JC or some deep state kind of situation. And it's using nuclear weapons, the most secret critical defense network technology. What do they call critical nuclear weapon secrets? The most secret nuclear weapons. This is why no one will talk about the videos. This is why no one can even comment on them. One of the big questions people. Ask is like, why won't Ryan. Graves make a comment on the videos? Why won't Hal Pudof, Eric Davis, why don't all why won't any of these people make a comment about. They. They literally will not even comment on the videos. Well, now we know why. It's a national, it's a breaking of classified information to even comment about the existence of the videos. You can't say anything about them. Even if they're already leaked on the internet because even if they're even if they're leaked on the internet, that does not declassify them. They're still classified even though they've leaked on the internet. And so if you are in the know, if you know that's Gorgon stair wide area motion imagery, you're literally not allowed to publicly talk about it. You're not allowed to public talk. You're not even allowed to publicly talk about it after you leave. After you leave the military, you still can't talk about it. You can never talk about it. This is why Sean Cahill, Minty Hyperspace on Twitter. I pressed him like five times cuz. He made a an unsolicited comment about how whoever if if somebody made those videos, they must have known about the Dirds, the papers that Hal Pudof published. Yeah. And I said, "Hey, bro. You talk to me about these videos.". Refuses. Refuses. Well, pretends like I don't exist. All these people pretend like I don't exist and they won't talk about the videos. And now after today, we know why. Okay. Resolute decide says, "Could a contractor be solely responsible?". This was actually a point that I did not bring up, but the same nuclear secrets, all those statutes, they also apply to defense contractors. Any defense contractor that works on these technologies also is under the exact same super strict regulations. Some of you in the chat who are smart are thinking and going, "Wait a minute. Loheed Martin compact fusion reactor. Charles Chase. Why is Charles Chase. Also dodging me? I mean, the guy's a super nice guy. He loves science. Charles Chase should be super interested in the MH370 videos. All the stuff Charles Chase reviews is exactly the same stuff that I review. But for some reason, he doesn't want to make any comments about the MA270 videos. And I specifically specifically called him out in an email that I've never shared asking, "Did you make these videos, bro? Did you make these videos?". And he wouldn't respond to the email. Wouldn't respond to the email. Not even to say no. Not even to say you're crazy. Not even to be a not even a polite no. I didn't make the videos. I have nothing to do with. Just wouldn't respond at all. I think now we know why. Peace and love. Thank you very much for that super sticker. I appreciate it. Okay, pill. Chat. Pill chat. What do we got going on? Pill chat, thank you with God's grace. I appreciate that. Gold pills by Raising Kane. Raising Kane, you're a goat, my friend. And then Matt 1776 gives me the cookie. Why do people in the UFO community keep getting off on threatening you? You know what? That's a really great question. I really don't understand it because I think it's because of jealousy. I think it's because they're concerned that if I end up being right, then like their credibility is destroyed forever, right? A lot of these people, especially early on, went all in on the videos being fake. When I say they went all in, what I mean is. They were ridiculing anybody that believed the videos were real. Ridiculing them, mercilessly ridiculing them. They claimed that the science wasn't real, that those are UFOs. They told people not to look at them. So now if it were to come out that those videos are real. Their credibility is permanently not eroded but straight up shattered. Shatters their credibility forever. And it's such a huge black eye to the UFO community because this is a community that's been researching UFOs for decades since the '9s at least that believes that aliens are visiting us. And so for someone like me to come in with those videos and say, "Nope, you're all wrong. It's not aliens, it's mostly US technology, and to to show it in such a straightforward way.". And to figure out the whole secret to figure out that it's connected to nukes and and uh fusion and all this stuff, this just it makes them look [ __ ] It makes them look completely inept because they are. They spent 30 years and never figured out anything. 30 years. And the people that came the closest in 30 years are Bob Lazar, who doesn't even believe in zero point energy, according to my sources, and Nick Cook, the hunt for zero point energy. In my opinion, those are the two people that came the closest, and neither of them has any idea what's going on. Any idea what's going on? I mean, Nick Cook kind of does, but he doesn't see the bigger picture at all. So, it's a huge black eye. That's probably the reason why they're coming after me. Probably the reason why they're attacking me. And the other reason is that they project their own insecurities. I notic this a lot about the human condition. Uh, it's all about psychology. They project their own insecurities onto me. All the things that they claim that I do, the doxing, the harassment, all this stuff. None of that's real. I don't do any of that [ __ ] I don't coordinate with anybody on anything. They do. They do all that. They're the ones. I actually caught one of these guys literally bot voting his own thing. I took a screenshot of his post where he was getting ratioed and I came back and looked at it an hour later and he had 500 new up votes or new likes or whatever. 500 new likes and an additional 70 retweets on an account with like a few thousand or a few hundred followers. 100% proving that they're bodied. Proving that they're bodied and it's all bodying on posts that are defamatory towards me. And they're they have their own Discord. They have their own Discord where they coordinate their harassment where they follow every single one of my posts and every time a new post comes out. They share it in the Discord in their little group of nut jobs and that's why you see the same information being posted on Twitter all the time. So there you go. That's the answer to why. And then Zaparoo, thank you very much for this additional last donation. What a fantastic week of streams and never forget Jeremy Corbel told you. Done told you. Yep, guys. Okay, thanks everybody. Um, can we invest in Sigma 1 or Sigma 11? I'm just looking at the Rumble chat, guys. Thank you in the Rumble and everybody. Who's been following. Rumble. These last few months as well. Um, no. But I think what we want to find out is. When can we invest in Helion Energy? Helen Fusion. Helen Fusion is the company that seems to be the one that's got the backing by the DOE. And whichever company has been picked to win, they're going to become trillion dollar company in Fusion if not mult. I mean, we're talking like maybe. By 2035, I could see Helium Fusion becoming a 10 trillion company. They're currently worth about 5 billion. So, that's about a 1,000 or or 20 uh thou uh yeah, 20,000% increase. I don't know, maybe those numbers aren't right, but a big increase. So, pay attention to Helen Fusion, Helen Energy, and their IPO. Whenever their IPO co IPO comes out, we're gonna blast that thing. Okay, guys. Thank you very much, MH370X. Let me post the Discord invite one last time. What are we going to play us out with tonight? I think we're going to do a different song tonight. We always play the same one every time. Well, I think we're going to go with CBS chat. I love Sibers. Okay, guys. Have a great night. I will see you guys on Monday. Peace out, everybody. Be well. Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk. Let's make this world a better place, everybody. Have a good night. Infrared eyes scanning the black, tracking the heat, never turning back. And 22, a covert gaze. And roll. 33. In the cosmic maze, and rolls in the mix, secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as spears. Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats of guiding our defenses like a guiding star. In the silence of space, they keep their post. Shields unseen yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missiles anger. As beers, sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star and trolls in the mix. Secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interests far and wide as spears. Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star. Spears, Sentinel of the Night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats a far, guiding our defense.